The study of ancient Indian history began with the
advent of British rule in India. The British viewed Indians as savage and
barbarians who were unfit to rule themselves and this was reflected in their
attitudes towards Indians. The colonial historians like James Mill and Vincent
Smith who first wrote the political and social history of ancient India wrote
the history of India from a colonial perspective to suit the interests of
British imperialism. They divided the history of India in to three periods-The Hindu
period, Muslim rule and the British and they concluded that Indians were
uncivilized and ruled by despots till the arrival of the British in India. This
was justified in their rule over India and exploitation of India’s resources.However,
Dayanand Saraswati, B G Tilak, V D Savarkar and K P Jayaswal were in the
forefront and proclaimed the superiority of Hindus over Western culture.
They declared that the Indo Aryans were the
originators of Indian civilization and the Vedas were the source of all
knowledge and rational thought.Tilak was
in the forefront of this by saying that the Rigveda was the earliest text in
India.K P Jayaswal believed that before
the advent of democracy in Europe India
had practiced it and thus they justified
self rule from the British.This was the beginning of extremist ideology in the
freedom movement of India.But
nationalist historians like Bipin Chandra has emphasized the role of the
Mutiny of 1857 ,the Congress and Mahatma Gandhi
as defining historical events.On the other hand Marxist historians like
Romila Thapar and Irfan Habib have focused on the class conflict and land
ownership in pre-colonial India and of deindustrialization in the Colonial period.
The Subaltern school which began in the 1980s has focused on history from below
looking at the peasants and working classes and has downplayed caste.
In ancient India between the end of the Indus Valley
civilization and the Second Urbanization the Vedic age (1500-500 BCE) played an
important role .It was in the Vedic period that the Vedas were composed and it
formed the basis of the influential Brahmanical ideology eventually developing
in the Kuru kingdom which was a tribal union of several Indo Aryan tribes. The
Vedic society was patriarchal and patrilineal.The early Indo Aryans were
centred in Punjab and they were organized in to tribes and sustained a pastoral
way of life. But in the later Vedic period (1000-500 BCE) these tribes
began to spread out from Punjab to the Indo Gangetic Plain. The availability of
fertile land and iron production led to the clearing of forests and the
adoption of agriculture.This period gave rise to the emergence of towns,
kingdoms and complex social differentiation. The end of the Vedic period gave
way to the formation of large states and kingdoms called Mahajanapadas and the
rise of Buddhism and Jainism challenging the orthodoxy of the Vedas. This
period corresponds with the Painted Grey Ware culture (PGW).The Indo Aryan
tribes were bound by kinship ties and tribal identity was an important feature
by which the territory of a particular tribe was identified.
The sixteen Mahajanapadas were distributed in the northern,
eastern and central parts of India. These tribes were often at war with each
other and were known as janas. In the course of time with the extension of agriculture
and division of labour society came to be divided in to jatis or varnas. The
four Varnas were the Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras.In addition to
this there were also the untouchables or the outcastes and were considered outside
the varna system. This eventually gave way to the caste system in ancient India.
Marriage between a Brahmin and a Shudra was strictly prohibited and each Varna
had their assigned occupations. Trade and urbanization played a significant
part in the Mahajanapadas. These Mahajanapadas
existed as republics and monarchies in ancient India. Magadha was the most
powerful of the Mahajanapadas and it finally established the Magadha Empire in
eastern India by defeating the other kingdoms.
The Magadha empire with its capital at Patliputra
consisted of three dynasties. The Haryanka dynasty,Shishunaga dynasty and the
Nanda dynasty.The Nanda dynasty was finally overthrown by Chandragupta Maurya with the assistance of Chanakya and with this
the Nanda dynasty came to an end.
The Mauryan empire (323-185BCE) founded by
Chandragupta Maurya was the largest empire in South Asia. He expanded his
kingdom to the western and central parts of India. After Chandragupta Maurya
his son Bindusara extended the empire to the south of India. Bindusara’s son
Ashoka further expanded the empire to include parts of south and west India.But
it was the Battle of Kalinga which became a turning point in his life. Though
Ashoka won the Battle of Kalinga he was deeply pained to see the devastation
and loss of life. After this he renounced war and embraced Buddhism. He
implemented principles of Ahimsa by banning hunting and violent sports activity.
After the death of Ashoka in 185 BCE the empire began to decline due to
Ashoka’s generous donations to Buddhist monasteries, internal revolts, a
succession of weak rulers and administrative collapse.
Kautilya’s Arthashastra mentions the structure of
the Mauryan state. The empire was divided in to four provinces with its capital
at Patliputra.The king was assisted by Mahamatyas and council of Ministers. The
head of the provincial administration was the Kumara (royal prince) who
governed the provinces as king’s representative. A vast espionage system
collected intelligence for both internal and external security. After the Mauryan
Empire post Mauryan kingdoms emerged in India like the Indo Greeks, Kushanas and
Satavahanas in the Deccan and the Tamil states in the south known as the Sangam
age.
The Satavahanas with their capital at Paithan and
Amaravati in modern day Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh ruled the Deccan region
of India. Their territory comprised the present states of Telangana, Andhra
Pradesh and Maharashtra. The empire reached the peak of its rule under
Gautamiputra Satakarni.In the Deep South the Cholas, Cheras and the Pandyas
ruled over South India. A remarkable feature of this period is the Sangam age
in which Tamil literature flourished. Three were three Sangams held in south
India .The first Sangam was held at Madurai, the second Sangam at Kapadapuram
and the third sangam was also Held at Madurai in Tamil Nadu.
By the late 3rd century AD the Gupta Empire
was founded by Maharaja Sri Gupta.The most notable rulers were Chandragupta I,
Samudragupta and Chandragupta II.The Gupta Empire is considered as the Golden
age of India and it was during this period that the Mahabharata and Ramayana
were canonized. The Gupta period also produced scholars such as Kalidasa,
Aryabhatta, Varamihira and Vatsyayana.This period witnessed achievements in architecture,
sculpture and painting. Samudragupta also called as the Napoleon of India made
further conquests and consolidated the empire.Samudragupta was succeeded by
Ramagupta, Chandragupta Vikramaditya, Kumaragupta and Skandagupta. After
Skandagupta the empire went in to decline.
The administrative system of the Gupta Empire shows
a hierarchy of administrative divisions from top to bottom. The empire was
divided in to 26 provinces which were called as Bhukti, Pradesha and
Bhoga. Provinces were also divided in to Vishayas and put under the control of
the Vishayapatis. The Vishayapati administered the Vishaya with the help of the Adhikarana
(Council of representatives).
From the post Mauryan period and especially from the
Gupta period the kings used to make land grants to the Brahmanas, a custom which
was sanctified in the Dharmashastras.Even during the Pre Mauryan period the
Buddhist Pali texts refer to the villages granted to the Brahmanas by the
rulers of Kosala and Magadha which has led historians to coin the term Indian feudalism.
The lands granted to the Brahmanas could not be confiscated as the Brahmanas were
at the top of the Varna hierarchy.By the post Gupta period even administrative
officials were granted land. This ultimately led to a breakdown in the central
authority. The major implications of feudal polity in India led to the creation
of powerful intermediaries which had great shares of economic and political
power.
Feudalism eventually led to the Brahmans moving
their focus from the religious functions to secular ones. The immediate
consequences of feudalism in India led to the political decentralization of
semiautonomous rulers like Samantas and Mahasamantas. Feudalism continued to
exist in India till the coming of the Mughals in 1500s.
No comments:
Post a Comment